Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles vs Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Dr. Scholl's
Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles
PFAS grade
D 65/100
Overall grade
F 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
foam cushioning, polyurethane gel, textile cover
Confidence
72%
PossiblePolyurethane foam degradation and particle shedding
PossiblePFAS in polyurethane gel layer or textile water-repellent treatment
Puma
Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes
PFAS grade
D 65/100
Overall grade
F 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Mesh textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole
Confidence
62%
PossibleAdhesive and bonding agent leachables
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from foam midsole
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking