Which is safer for PFAS: Crock-Pot Crock-Pot Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner or Crock-Pot Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge. Crock-Pot Crock-Pot Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner grades F (15/100) and Crock-Pot Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners grades F (15/100) on our public PFAS rubric.

Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner vs Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Crock-Pot

Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner

PFAS grade

F 15/100

Overall grade

F 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

nylon or polyester liner with unspecified coating

Confidence

35%

PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (from unspecified nonstick coating)

PossibleMicroplastic or fiber shedding

LikelyCoating delamination or degradation over time

Why this grade

Crock-Pot

Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners

PFAS grade

F 15/100

Overall grade

F 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Plastic-coated paper liner; coating type not disclosed

Confidence

35%

PossibleUndisclosed Teflon-family coating or water-resistant coating (possible Teflon-type coating/PFOA relatives)

ReportedCoating degradation and migration with age or heat

PossibleMicroplastic or paper fiber shedding when heated or punctured

Why this grade

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More slow cooker liners: see the full ranking