Which is safer for PFAS: Crisco Crisco No Stick Cooking Spray or Resolve Resolve Urine Destroyer?

Resolve Urine Destroyer is the clear pick. Crisco No Stick Cooking Spray carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product. Crisco Crisco No Stick Cooking Spray grades F (35/100) and Resolve Resolve Urine Destroyer grades A (100/100) on our public PFAS rubric.

No Stick Cooking Spray vs Urine Destroyer: which is safer?

Resolve Urine Destroyer is the clear pick. Crisco No Stick Cooking Spray carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Crisco

No Stick Cooking Spray

PFAS grade

F 35/100

Overall grade

F 9/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Propellant blend, oil base, silicone coating (unspecified)

Confidence

35%

PossibleSilicone coating unknown composition and migration

PossiblePropellant inhalation from aerosolization

ReportedThermal degradation of oil base and coating at extreme temperatures

Why this grade

Our pick

Resolve

Urine Destroyer

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

D 68/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

aqueous enzymatic cleaner solution

Confidence

82%

ReportedEye and skin irritation (surfactants and preservatives)

PossiblePreservative allergen risk (e.g., methylisothiazolinone if present)

PossibleFragrance allergens

Why this grade Buy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fabric protection & stain-resistant sprays: see the full ranking