Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food vs 1990, McDonald's Paper Hamburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage): which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food

Burger King

Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food

PFAS grade

F 25/100

Overall grade

analysis pending

Verdict

pending

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

Paper with grease-resistant coating (unspecified)

Confidence

35%
1990, McDonald's Paper Hamburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage)

McDonald's

1990, McDonald's Paper Hamburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage)

PFAS grade

F 25/100

Overall grade

F 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

paper with grease-resistant coating

Confidence

45%

LikelyPFAS in grease-resistant coating

PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle release

PossibleMold or microbial contamination from aging

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fast-casual food packaging: see the full ranking