H&M Boys Twill Chinos vs The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants: which is safer?

The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

H&M Boys Twill Chinos

Boys khaki pants

H&M Boys Twill Chinos

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

cotton twill, likely untreated

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins (finishing agents)

PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)

ReportedVolatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing

Our pick

The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants

Boys khaki pants

The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton-polyester blend stretch chino

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant residues

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleElastane degradation and microfiber shedding

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms: see the full ranking