Boys' Cat & Jack Bottoms Cat & Jack Straight Pants vs The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Boys' Cat & Jack Bottoms Cat & Jack Straight Pants

Boys khaki pants

Boys' Cat & Jack Bottoms Cat & Jack Straight Pants

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

cotton/cotton blend khaki pants

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins (wrinkle finish or sizing)

PossibleAntimony in polyester component

PossibleMicrofiber shedding and microplastics

The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants

Boys khaki pants

The Children's Place Boys Stretch Chino Pants

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton-polyester blend stretch chino

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant residues

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleElastane degradation and microfiber shedding

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms: see the full ranking