Kipton Slim Arm Sofa In Upholstered/fabric In Natural Standard 40" 94" | Plush Linen | Arhaus vs West Elm Andes Sofa 77: which is safer?

West Elm Andes Sofa 77 is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Arhaus

Kipton Slim Arm Sofa In Upholstered/fabric In Natural Standard 40" 94" | Plush Linen | Arhaus

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

F 59/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Plush linen upholstery

Confidence

72%

PossibleFlame-retardant chemical treatment (brominated or phosphorus-based)

PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing finishes (dye-fixatives, wrinkle-resistance resins)

PossibleHeavy metal contamination in synthetic dyes

Why this gradeBuy

Our pick

Greenguard

West Elm Andes Sofa 77

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

C 70/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Upholstered seating with Greenguard certification

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde from wood frame and adhesives

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from foam and fabric finish

LikelyFlame retardants in foam and/or fabric

Why this gradeBuy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More upholstered furniture: see the full ranking