Tracking Ring vs Smart Ring for Women Men, Bluetooth 5.4 Fitness Ring with Touch, Fitness Tracker with Vibration Reminder, IP68 Waterproo: which is safer?

Tracking Ring is the clear pick. Smart Ring for Women Men, Bluetooth 5.4 Fitness Ring with Touch, Fitness Tracker with Vibration Reminder, IP68 Waterproo carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Tracking Ring

Amazon

Tracking Ring

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

A 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Stainless steel, titanium alloy, sapphire glass

Confidence

72%

PossibleNickel in stainless steel alloy

PossibleSkin irritation from prolonged contact

Smart Ring for Women Men, Bluetooth 5.4 Fitness Ring with Touch, Fitness Tracker with Vibration Reminder, IP68 Waterproo

Samsung

Smart Ring for Women Men, Bluetooth 5.4 Fitness Ring with Touch, Fitness Tracker with Vibration Reminder, IP68 Waterproo

PFAS grade

F 40/100

Overall grade

F 28/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Unknown coating over electronics/metals, waterproof treatment unspecified

Confidence

35%

PossibleUndisclosed waterproof coating (likely Teflon-family coating or silicone-based)

PossibleNickel leaching from metal band or plated contacts

PossibleBacterial or biofilm growth under band due to moisture retention

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water-resistant smart rings & bands: see the full ranking