Tracking Ring vs NFC Smart Ring Men Women Heart Rate Health Monitor Sleep Monitors Smartring IP68 Waterproof: which is safer?

Tracking Ring is the clear pick. NFC Smart Ring Men Women Heart Rate Health Monitor Sleep Monitors Smartring IP68 Waterproof carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Tracking Ring

Amazon

Tracking Ring

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

A 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Stainless steel, titanium alloy, sapphire glass

Confidence

72%

PossibleNickel in stainless steel alloy

PossibleSkin irritation from prolonged contact

NFC Smart Ring Men Women Heart Rate Health Monitor Sleep Monitors Smartring IP68 Waterproof

Samsung

NFC Smart Ring Men Women Heart Rate Health Monitor Sleep Monitors Smartring IP68 Waterproof

PFAS grade

F 40/100

Overall grade

F 26/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Titanium alloy body with unspecified waterproof coatings

Confidence

45%

PossibleUndisclosed waterproof coatings (potential PFAS or other fluorinated compounds)

ReportedCoating degradation and leaching over time

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water-resistant smart rings & bands: see the full ranking