(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe vs 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY: which is safer?

(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe is the clear pick. Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe

Aigostar

(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe

PFAS grade

A 90/100

Overall grade

B 82/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nonstick coating (unspecified type); stainless steel steamer tray

Confidence

62%

PossibleNonstick coating degradation and fume risk (non-PFAS)

PossibleMicroplastics from coating wear (if polymer-based nonstick)

Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

Tiger

10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

PFAS grade

F 15/100

Overall grade

F 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Inner cooking bowl with nonstick coating (type unspecified); aluminum/steel body

Confidence

45%

PossibleTeflon-type coating fume inhalation (nonstick coating)

LikelyCoating degradation and microparticle release

PossibleAluminum leaching from bowl interior

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More rice cookers: see the full ranking