Is Lola PFAS-free?
Across 23 graded products, Lola averages C (70/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 21 of its products grade C or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
Worth buying from Lola C or better, safest first
Lola
Organic Cotton Tampons
organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)
Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Cotton Pads with Wings
Organic cotton (absorbent core); no water-resistant or stain-resistant coating disclosed
Lower concern, organic cotton period pads have minimal PFAS risk; buy with confidence.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Disposable Postpartum Underwear
organic cotton with elastane/spandex
Lower-concern choice; MADE SAFE certification reduces risk, but no explicit PFAS testing disclosure.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Tampons
organic cotton tampons
Lower PFAS concern; organic cotton tampons don't require water-repellent coatings, but brand makes no explicit PFAS commitment.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons | LOLA 9 Regular, 9 Super / Volume discount
Organic cotton (rayon/viscose core likely)
Lower PFAS concern, conventional tampon materials carry minimal risk, but no third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Cardboard Applicator Organic Tampons | LOLA All Regular / Box of 18
Cardboard applicator, organic cotton tampon
Lower PFAS concern; cardboard and organic cotton are inherently low-risk materials with no typical fluorochemical triggers.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Organic Cotton Tampons with Plastic Applicator | LOLA All Super / Volume Discount
organic cotton core + plastic applicator
Lower PFAS concern for the organic cotton portion; plastic applicator warrants scrutiny but no public evidence of PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
L. Organic Cotton Tampons
organic cotton (core/absorbent)
Lower concern; organic cotton tampons typically pose minimal PFAS risk, but brand offers no explicit assurance.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Compact Tampons
organic cotton, rayon, cardboard applicator
Lower-concern choice; no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
L. Organic Cotton Core Tampons Duo Pack Super/Super Plus
organic cotton core with cardboard applicator
Lower concern; organic cotton tampons carry minimal PFAS risk, though brand transparency on materials is absent.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Organic Period Pads with Wings
organic cotton, plant-based cellulose
Lower concern, organic materials used, but brand does not disclose PFAS specifics.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Organic Cotton Postpartum Pads
Organic cotton core, unspecified topsheet/adhesive layers
Likely lower concern; organic cotton base is a positive signal, but lack of transparency on coatings and adhesives is a minor red flag.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
L. Ultra Thin Organic Cotton Top Layer Pads
organic cotton top layer
Lower PFAS concern, organic cotton pads rarely need fluorinated coatings, but brand silence on practices leaves room for uncertainty.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Heating Patch
Non-woven fabric backing, adhesive heat layer, gel pack (water-based)
Lower PFAS concern; no evidence of water-repellent coating or Teflon-family coating use in standard formulation.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
L. Ultra Thin Organic Cotton Overnight Pads
organic cotton, likely cotton-based absorbent core
Lower PFAS concern; organic cotton core typical, but waterproof backing materials unspecified, ask brand directly.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Ultra Thin Liners
cotton/rayon absorbent core, likely polypropylene or polyethylene backing
Lower-concern category; no red flags, but brand silence on PFAS limits assurance.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Organic Cotton Postpartum Pads Phase 1
organic cotton
Lower PFAS concern for core material, but synthetic absorbent layers not publicly disclosed.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
Organic Cotton Period Underwear | LOLA XXL
organic cotton with elastane blend
Lower-concern choice; organic cotton base mitigates PFAS risk, but Lola makes no public commitment on chemical treatments.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
The Lola High Waist Period Underwear
Cotton blend gusset with absorbent layers; no specialty coatings disclosed
Lower concern product, fabric-only construction with no waterproofing treatment typical of PFAS use.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
The High Waisted Period Microfiber For Medium Flows
microfiber (polyester blend)
Lower PFAS concern for this product category, but Lola's silence on materials deserves scrutiny.
⚠Risky category by default
Lola
The Period Company The High Waisted Period. in Cotton For Medium Flows Women's
Cotton fabric, menstrual pad core
Lower PFAS concern for core material; period-care padding rarely uses water-repellent treatments requiring PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Graded and flagged D and F, we’d swap these
Lola
MeLuna Lola Bikini Period Underwear
Cotton blend with waterproof/moisture-wicking coating
Skip unless Lola discloses waterproof coating chemistry, water-repellent coating textiles often use PFAS.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Lola
Lula Bubble Period Underwear
Fabric blend with unspecified waterproof/absorbent coating
Skip until brand discloses waterproof treatment chemistry, period underwear often uses PFAS coatings.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →